Loading
Review of Case Materials
Reviews records, documents, testimony, data, and other relevant materials and consults with counsel regarding technical issues related to the matter.
Provide Expert Analysis
Applies specialized knowledge and experience to evaluate the technical or professional issues involved.
Form Expert Opinions
Develops independent, supportable opinions based on the available evidence and relevant standards.
Prepare Expert Reports
Showing Results 0 of 0
A forensic engineer investigates technical questions involving failures, accidents, defects, or unexpected performance of engineered systems. The work can include inspecting physical evidence, documenting site conditions, reviewing drawings and calculations, evaluating test data, comparing conditions with engineering principles or applicable standards, and testing competing explanations for what occurred. The specific methods depend on the engineering discipline and the technical issue presented by the case.
The investigation usually begins by defining the failure or performance problem and preserving the available evidence. The engineer can then examine physical damage, operating history, design information, maintenance records, environmental conditions, loads, material behavior, and other relevant facts. Competing hypotheses can be compared against the evidence to determine which explanations are technically consistent with the observed conditions and which are contradicted or unsupported.
A site inspection can preserve information that photographs or records do not fully capture, including dimensions, deformation, fracture locations, component relationships, environmental conditions, and evidence of repair or alteration. Measurements and observations made at the site may also help the engineer determine what testing or additional documentation is needed. When the original condition has already changed, the expert must account for those limitations in any later reconstruction or causal opinion.
Forensic engineering describes the investigative application of engineering principles, not a substitute for discipline-specific competence. A structural failure may require a structural engineer, an electrical incident may require an electrical engineer, and a soil or foundation dispute may call for geotechnical expertise. Counsel should match the expert's education, licensure, technical experience, and investigative background to the engineering questions that actually control the case.
Forensic Engineering, +4
Construction
Property Damage, +4
Insurance
Prepares clear, well-supported expert reports outlining methodology, analysis, findings, and opinions.
Provide Deposition Testimony
Explains findings and opinions under oath and responds to questioning during deposition testimony.
Testify in Court
Presents specialized findings and opinions clearly to judges, juries, arbitrators, or other decision-makers.
Yes, when the applicable code, standard, specification, or engineering criterion falls within the expert's qualifications and is relevant to the disputed condition. The engineer can compare documented design, construction, installation, operation, or maintenance practices with the criteria that applied to the situation. A departure from a standard does not automatically establish the legal outcome of a case, so technical compliance opinions should remain separate from ultimate legal conclusions.
Construction Defect, +4
Construction
Bad Faith, +4
Insurance
